http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/terra_nova/index.html?story=/ent/tv/feature/2011/09/26/terra_nova_season_one_premiere_pilot

One of the articles I chose this week, by author Matt Zoller Seitz, was basically a review of the new television show Terra Nova. The review makes the show seem very interesting for people that enjoy science fiction films or works of Spielberg. Knowing that I like many of Spielberg's movies I may try out the show. The downfall of it appears to be its lack of special affects. This is disappointing as viewers like movies to be as realistic as possible. Although, I don't expect new T.V. shows to have high budgets and the author specifically wrote, "The special effects and production design suggest a discount version of Spielberg's "Jurassic Park"..."
In a way the author seems to hint that he does not have any interest in the show. For example the author wrote "like most premieres, it's mostly exposition wrapped in spectacle, and it has other problems". In a joking way, Seitz, attempts to tear apart the show by presenting several rhetorical questions at the end of the article. This implies that he believes that the show is too unrealistic to appreciate. Terra Nova could be another "Lost" based on popularity and fan hype or, as Seitz appears to suggest, it could end up as a sci-fi flop
One of the articles I chose this week, by author Matt Zoller Seitz, was basically a review of the new television show Terra Nova. The review makes the show seem very interesting for people that enjoy science fiction films or works of Spielberg. Knowing that I like many of Spielberg's movies I may try out the show. The downfall of it appears to be its lack of special affects. This is disappointing as viewers like movies to be as realistic as possible. Although, I don't expect new T.V. shows to have high budgets and the author specifically wrote, "The special effects and production design suggest a discount version of Spielberg's "Jurassic Park"..."
In a way the author seems to hint that he does not have any interest in the show. For example the author wrote "like most premieres, it's mostly exposition wrapped in spectacle, and it has other problems". In a joking way, Seitz, attempts to tear apart the show by presenting several rhetorical questions at the end of the article. This implies that he believes that the show is too unrealistic to appreciate. Terra Nova could be another "Lost" based on popularity and fan hype or, as Seitz appears to suggest, it could end up as a sci-fi flop